Promoting Democracy through International Law

Mar 31, 2004

To view and/or download this report in its entirety, click on the attached PDF.

Abstract

The contributors argue that the Bush administration’s approach to democratization does not draw adequately on international law. The trial of Saddam Hussein and treatment of prisoners of war violate normal due process and, equally importantly, are symptomatic of an attitude that places elections first and basic human rights second. As a result, the model of democracy that is being promoted in and beyond the Arab world is neither sufficiently effective nor legitimate in the eyes of local populations and the international community.

The contributors propose a range of actions to enable the U.S. to regain its position as a standard-bearer on civil and political rights. They also discuss the relative merits of trials and truth commissions, the doctrine of pre-emption, and the role of the media.

Table of Contents
Foreword from the President
Joel Rosenthal

PROMOTING DEMOCRACY THROUGH INTERNATIONAL LAW
Democracy and Rule of Law Endangered
Remarks by Andrew Kuper

How International Law Strengthens New Democracies
Remarks by Richard Goldstone

No Democracy without International Law
Remarks by Aryeh Neier

Questions and Answers
1. Trials versus truth commissions
2. Responsible media and the complexity of international law
3. The Bush Doctrine of pre-emption: Is it legal?
4. Would a democracy compliance mechanism work?

You may also like

OCT 8, 2025 Video

The Fracturing of Democratic Institutions & the Variations of Autocracy

In this pre-Global Ethics Day event, leading scholar practitioners grapple with critical questions regarding the future of democracy.

OCT 6, 2025 Article

A Conversation with Carnegie Ethics Fellow Molly Schaeffer

This interview series profiles members of the CEF cohort. This talk features Molly Schaeffer, executive director of the NYC Mayor's Office of Asylum Seeker Operations.

OCT 1, 2025 Podcast

The Cost of Military Primacy, with Peter Harris

Colorado State's Peter Harris discusses what a less militarized future might look like for the U.S. and the Trump administration's impact on foreign policy.

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation